VDI / DaaS / F360 Comparison

Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Fortified360 — The Architectural Difference
Secure Workspace Platform · 2026 Comparison

Every other VDI defends the data.
Fortified360 removes it from the device entirely.

The market's leading desktop-as-a-service platforms all share one design assumption: data lands on the endpoint, then gets protected after the fact. Fortified360 was built on the opposite premise — nothing is ever exposed to defend.

Protect Everything. Expose Nothing.
0
Bytes on Endpoint

Pixels stream to the device. Data never lands locally, so there is no exfiltration surface to police.

0
Agents Required

Full access from any browser. No client software, no EDR, MDM, VPN, or DLP stack on the device.

4
Built-in Frameworks

NIST, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC alignment is architectural — not an add-on you assemble later.

The Comparison Set

We benchmarked against the four Gartner DaaS Leaders — not the easy targets.

The August 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Desktop-as-a-Service named four Leaders. These are the strongest platforms on the market. Fortified360 is measured against all of them.

Gartner Leader

Azure Virtual Desktop

The most-deployed platform, riding deep Microsoft 365 integration. Full Windows VMs, full endpoint dependency.

Caveat: Azure-locked; US CLOUD Act data-sovereignty exposure.
Gartner Leader

Citrix DaaS

The regulated-industry incumbent for complex app delivery. Powerful, but heavy to design, tune, and run.

Caveat: High implementation and ongoing management effort.
Gartner Leader

Amazon WorkSpaces

The AWS-native choice with pay-as-you-go desktops. Easy to start; consumption costs grow unpredictably.

Caveat: AWS-bound; latency and cost scale with usage.
Gartner Leader

Omnissa Horizon

The former VMware Horizon EUC business, now KKR-owned. Mature feature set amid post-divestiture upheaval.

Caveat: 16–21% price increases announced May 2026; migration churn.
Capability Matrix

Where the architecture diverges, the table tells the story.

Capability Azure Virtual Desktop Citrix DaaS Amazon WorkSpaces Omnissa Horizon Fortified360
Security Architecture
Security model Perimeter + endpoint Perimeter + endpoint Perimeter + endpoint Perimeter + endpoint Zero-trust by design
Data on local device Yes Yes Yes Yes None — pixel-only stream
Attack surface High (full OS) High (full OS) High (full OS) High (full OS) Minimal — no local OS
Ransomware resilience Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Very high — sessions reset
Immutable applications No No No No Yes — cannot be altered
Ephemeral sessions Limited No No Limited Yes — attackers ejected at logout
Endpoint & Access
Endpoint software required Client + stack Client + stack WorkSpaces client Client + stack None — 100% browser
Endpoint security tools needed EDR · MDM · VPN · DLP EDR · MDM · VPN · DLP EDR · MDM · VPN · DLP EDR · MDM · VPN · DLP None on endpoint
BYOD support Limited Poor Limited Limited Native — any device
Threat protection & 24×7 SOC Add-on / BYO Add-on / BYO Add-on / BYO Add-on / BYO Included — SOC + IR
Operations & Economics
Patch & OS management High (images, FSLogix) High (gold images) High (VMs, images) High (gold images) Platform-managed
Zero-day exposure window Patch-cycle dependent Patch-cycle dependent Patch-cycle dependent Patch-cycle dependent In-memory shielding
MSP implementation effort High — Azure expertise High — design & tuning Medium–High High — vSphere expertise Low — deploy & go live
Cloud dependency Azure-only Citrix + infra AWS-only vSphere / multi-cloud Cloud-agnostic
Compliance alignment Add-ons required Add-ons required Add-ons required Add-ons required Built-in (NIST·ISO·SOC2·CMMC)
Platform Flexibility
Multiple OS per user One desktop/user One desktop/user One desktop/user One desktop/user Run multiple OS at once
OT / IoT isolated access Not ideal Not ideal Not ideal Not ideal Purpose-built for IT/OT
Scalability Cost-variable Infra-heavy VM-bound Infra-heavy Instant, elastic
Architectural strength Conditional / add-on Endpoint-dependent gap
The Architectural Difference

Four reasons the comparison isn't close.

01

No data, no breach

The Leaders deliver a full operating system to the endpoint, then layer EDR, DLP, MDM, and VPN to guard it. Fortified360 streams only pixels — data never reaches the device. There is no exfiltration surface to monitor, because there is nothing local to take.

02

Immutable by default

Applications cannot be altered, and every session resets. An attacker who gains a foothold is ejected at logout with nothing to persist. Ransomware that depends on writing to a durable endpoint simply has nowhere to land.

03

Weeks, not quarters

VDI Leaders demand gold images, patch cycles, and platform specialists. Fortified360 is deploy-assign-go-live: no agents to push, no security stack to assemble on the endpoint, no cloud lock-in to negotiate around. Threat protection and a 24×7 SOC are included, not sourced.

04

Compliance is the architecture

For the others, NIST, ISO, SOC 2, and CMMC alignment is an assembly project of add-ons. Fortified360 is zero-exfiltration by design, so the controls auditors look for are satisfied by how the platform works — not by what you bolt on afterward.

Stop defending the data. Remove it from the equation.

See the invisible, isolated workspace that eliminates exfiltration by design — and what it would take to stand it up for your environment.

Request a Fortified360 Briefing
fortified360.net  ·  info@fortified360.net  ·  (832) 812-1657
FORTIFIED360 — Protect Everything. Expose Nothing. Comparison set: Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for DaaS Leaders, Aug 2025